By Wendy Olmsted, Walter Jost, Charles Altieri, Don H. Bialostosky, Wayne Booth
A significant other to Rhetoric and Rhetorical feedback deals the 1st significant survey in twenty years of the sphere of rhetorical stories and of the perform of rhetorical idea and feedback throughout more than a few disciplines. The contributions are written by way of major students from quite a few assorted fields and feature all been in particular commissioned for this quantity. They specialize in particular works, difficulties, or figures, pursuing concept and feedback from an engaged and useful point of view. the quantity additionally comprises an summary of rhetorical traditions, offering examples of rhetoric from precedent days to the current day. Designed to be available to more than a few scholars and students, A spouse to Rhetoric and Rhetorical feedback elaborates in interesting methods simply what it capability to ''think like a rhetorician.''
Read or Download A Companion to Rhetoric and Rhetorical Criticism PDF
Best rhetoric books
Remark parler, pourquoi écrire ? Voilà de quoi discutent, en cette fin du Ve siècle avant J. -C. , deux Athéniens étendus près d'un gattilier en fleur, à l'ombre d'un platane sous lequel coule une resource, sur les bords de l'Ilissos, à quelques centaines de mètres de l'Acropole.
Marga Reimer and Anne Bezuidenhout current a suite of brand-new essays on vital issues on the intersection of philosophy and linguistics. Written by way of a stellar line-up of participants drawn from either disciplines, the papers will likewise allure a large readership of execs and scholars from both sides.
Style reports and style techniques to literacy guide proceed to improve in lots of areas and from a widening number of methods. style has supplied a key to knowing the various literacy cultures of areas, disciplines, professions, and academic settings. style IN A altering international presents a wide-ranging sampler of the extraordinary number of present paintings.
A cautious research of the rhetorical considered Ren? Descartes and of a extraordinary workforce of post-Cartesians. protecting a special diversity of authors, together with Bernard Lamy and Nicolas Malebranche, Carr assaults the assumption, which has develop into standard in modern feedback, that the Cartesian procedure is incompatible with rhetoric.
- Scientific Discourse in Sociohistorical Context: The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675-1975 (Rhetoric, Knowledge, and Society)
- Rhetoric as Currency: Hoover, Roosevelt, and the Great Depression
- Beyond Rhetoric and Realism in Economics: Towards a Reformulation of Methodology (Economics As Social Theory)
- Identity and Power in Narratives of Displacement
Extra resources for A Companion to Rhetoric and Rhetorical Criticism
M. (1953). The Ethics of Rhetoric. Chicago: H. Regnery. Williams, B. (1981). Moral Luck. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. FU RT H E R REA DIN G Kahn, V. (1985). Rhetoric, Prudence, and Skepticism in the Renaissance. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Pocock, J. G. A. (1975). The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
B. (1993). Norms of Rhetorical Culture. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Fish, S. (1989). Doing What Comes Naturally. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Great Ideas: A Syntopicon, The (1952). 2 vols. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. See chapter 9 on ‘‘Chance,’’ vol. 1, pp. 179–92; chapter 27 on ‘‘Fate,’’ vol. 1, pp. 515–25; and chapter 61 on ‘‘Necessity and Contingency,’’ vol. 2, pp. 251–69. Grimaldi, W. M. , SJ (1980). Aristotle, Rhetoric I: A Commentary. New York: Fordham University Press.
1975). The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. New York: Cambridge University Press. ’’1 Here, standing near the end of a long Athenian tradition of democratic deliberative oratory, Aristotle captures the tension that has troubled this tradition since its inception. In Athens, decision-making by popular democratic institutions (law courts and the Assembly) depended upon deliberation in the form of speeches for and against a proposition.